Ruby RubaGoverni
In an ideal state (not ours, of course) in which the ethics of individuals that make up the organization of the state is intact and free from conflicts of interest and interest on a personal ,
a prime minister or any deputy or a statesman, but also the individual identified in a simple citizen is free to have personal relationships with anyone who wants and more.
As long as the fibula and consenting to be interested in the fact itself.
That is not ever a criminal offense, if anything, the problem is ethical and social, that politician or a statesman against his company, from which he was nominated and elected.
Going back in the political world there are many cases where a president of the republic and chairman of the board or the various ministers, have had sex scandals of various kinds, more or less serious than those that occurred in our house.
I'elis thought about it at this threshold, if a president or a politician who is normally his duties as prime minister, ruling in a clear, stable and fair country, and this individual has the esteem of his people for operations and work of his government, as long as it does not do crime but feel the need the need de man "sexually free" to have different relationships with different women, always provided that they are consenting adults and do not escort or payable in cash or in political favors and another gene, it remains well within the law is free to have a private sex life to his liking.
Codest person will be moot by the public only for its moral conduct (and not cheap) because it must always give the example to his people.
And it is obvious to see that a country with a premier "Whore" is not it nice it constructively, especially if that weigh the economic and social situation is not stable, but rather the people are subject to a thousand adventures to succeed to live with dignity.
fact remains that the privacy of the subject should not be disgraced in the trial of all four winds, fibula and those whose private life private, but maybe it really searching out the skeletons inside there is far worse than it says and judges.
Imagine if the privacy of every individual citizen was common knowledge, the scandals and betrayal and other forms of perversion that would be afloat, we would have to say all that and more.
So I strongly believe that the life of an individual in terms of legality must remain private.
Before considering the merits of our argument, let us remember as great, but great presidents the past (carat, well above B), such as JF Kennedy in his sadly short life ranean was a great president, although subject to some very strong political contradictions in its complexity is that the battle is fought was one of the greatest U.S. presidents. Remember that it (Kennedy) was also one of the biggest "whoremongers" of history, happily married with children, and other so happily went to bed with dozens of different women in all its institutional transfers and even his best lover for years and years it was Marilyn Monroe. All this while his wife and the people knew, but few or almost none you are allowed to judge, because the president did his job and did it well, and what happens in his bed not matter to people, because it is happy and content of the work of its chairman.
different case of Bill Clinton, his history is the memory of all.
I think that is the only or one of the few presidents who accepted worldwide in the light of all his misdeeds, and the only crimes are those motivated him to ethics, the president must set a good example and can not fall in certain temptations, especially at the place where it carries out institutional his work.
But even here the public, apart from the wonder starting a small circle of the fierce political opponents, has forgiven in full its president, because it governs the country, and also good (in my personal opinion the best Republican president in history, or almost U.S.).
In our case, the scandals are many and repeated over time, indicating a reluctance on the part of our Prime Minister to this practice, ok that until it commits an offense anything goes, but because he is not free and clear from the point view of all these additional judicial scandals do nothing but aggravate the consideration that the people and the international community has for him.
Then there little wonder that with the release of confidential documents U.S. administration (which face it in the next article) label our premier as a gigolo.
His withered and its practices have been known for some time, not by the merits of a man of seventy years ago that some kind of "party" consider only the fact that all these reports were followed by a payment or in cash or in Favors by B. against escort duty, and this is the serious matter, which is a crime, the abuse of power and dominance.
Going further on the merits seems hardly feasible I would say even impossible for the nephew of a powerful president, rich and famous as Mubarak to win living must take part in the feasts of B.
Even more ridiculous is that B. makes up just as aggravating to move the police that the minor was the grandson of Mubarak knowing perfectly well the president and not the slightest thought to what he was thinking and doing, because I do not think it's nice to say to a man and above all a man of that caliber, "but you know you have a nephew who is a great putt ...."
Among presidents, to maintain a balance of international relations and responsive, these things should not happen, at least if it corresponded true because B. sooner or after calling the police did not contact directly the President Mubarak to inform him of what? Visas (to him) the splendid reports?
I also wonder why some cases go out to months away, is true that we must consider the fact that some people speak of the facts for which only a month away (by way of repentance, to understand), but few know and as many imagine, there is a group of people working out of trouble for Tirat B.
Journalists of many publications that seek, uncover, investigate the universe B.
He did not do anything to be found in crime or scandal within is more or less serious, and it takes little to build a database and pull out the scandal for any occasion. The question we must ask ourselves is:
considering the state judicial personnel of the premier, full of jobs, in which he was acquitted of having committed the requirement is not so ... considering that the previous sex scandals and not, because our prime minister does not enter into a perspective of respect for the Italian people to it without being laughed at (because it is actually so) abroad for sexual adventures of our Prime Minister, which change over woman when he wants (which, as previously mentioned is not a crime) leads in her "wild partying" too juvenile?
them is there and the offense is serious. But of course with the shield he comes out clean.
But that's another story.
What 's possible that his personal interests smuova gigolo from all over the world and the interests of the people he represents and which is like waving left and right voted for him did not move a finger?
How can a whore and not only you but many many (e) other within the partying has the personal telephone number of the Prime Minister?
The best way (besides that of St. Victor, but that's another story) is that of redemption, and you start to think and act for the good of the country, start making a life suited to a man of his age,
also do not say otherwise because of his caliber should put the cap under test and a shotgun in his hand.
But that's another story ... ... ...
