 |
| It is from here |
"[...] the vision of unity that recognizes the distinctions, pluralistic unity and undifferentiated, 's units based on self-government institutions that make possible the greater participation of citizens in public affairs, federalism as a form of units that best exemplifies the principle of freedom [...]" But at the end of this vision Carlo Cattaneo did not prevail and "was therefore with the imprint of centralization Piedmont, bond, according to that model, which was built our national state unit. [...] reflect on the errors in the source of our national state , aggravatisi and persisted in certain phases of the next 150 years, we work to reform and renew that which is necessary in the wake of the great principles and guidelines Republican Constitution. "
I reported an excerpt of the speech held by the President at the meeting today (2:02:11) with the authorities and the mayors of the Province of Bergamo. The President then rushes in forward, feeling the need to " reform and renewal that is needed ".
Yet even today, of federalism and reform discussion does not talk much and if you do, the light that seems to prevail is that of partisan politics, the opposition" in principle "to the premier. Not only: always buy more space in national newspapers and local party's aversion to the Northern League, the movement that has had the merit (and this is indisputable) to reopen the debate on the need for reform fully federal state.
Aversion and I would say political fear. In this sense, limited to two articles I quote each other: the first is an editorial signed by S. Rizzo The vices of the Roman Po "(Corriere del Veneto, 29.01.11), the second a political news story" The left launches challenge. The League? Only a fake "(Il Mattino di Padova, 30.01.11).
Starting from the alleged tensions within the League, in the press, Rizzo writes:" We know that behind this apparent dispute over the value of national unity there is a lot at stake in Carroccio domestic politics: the helm of the national secretary of Liga Veneta-Lega Nord. Just as happens in every party, where the ideological clashes are often the screen trivial questions of power. Why will not like it, but the league is a party like everyone else. It is the oldest political education among all those present in the Italian parliament . "That a journalist and a writer the caliber of Rizzo speaks in this way, in my opinion is frankly disappointing, I understand the criticism and opposition, but when it comes to concrete things. But when it is critical to sport, Italian, for the sake of talk, you fall in a vacuum and a disarming lack of thickness.
Yes, because the prevailing journalistic trend is that for which if there is a disagreement within the Democratic Party, for example, it is called internal dialectic, of constructive dialogue, exchange of ideas and when this takes place in the League, we talk about "issues of power trivial", knowing that the secretary of a party in a sense dictates the direction the program, the tones and alliances. Gloss that the " League is the oldest political formation " is a matter of record in place so ridiculous as the other youth was captured and disseminated through various changes of name and symbol: if the "best youth "Politics is the UDC, the PD, SEL, we are fresh ...
About the "new" Left Party Environment and Freedom, Alessandro Zan speaks of "fake League" and declares that " the league has made communication a powerful tool with which it has generated fears, speculating on the difficulties of the people, and then was elevated to champion that defends good Venetian these fears in these fear [...]". So advice Zan reading an article of 31.01.11: The "Gazzettino di Padova" (page 2 - Final Padova) reported the involvement of Sandro Pouches, president of the Italian Federation of brokers and agents related to Ascom business, and what are you reading? In Padua " [...] entire areas in a few years are going to meet a real estate devaluation that plunged their old market value" because of " degradation, created by the opening of multiethnic bazaars, of amusement arcades and betting, the massive presence of the homeless and illegal ", a" bad political management of the territory .
I can already hear the comments in a minor key here is the League's "racist" that emerges. If you do not enough of my past Catholic educator countered these criticisms, citing close Luca Zaia in his inaugural address:
" I think no more of the undersigned has demonstrated both by administrative actions to be taken with public position, because I feel personally close to the honest immigrants who come to us to improve the quality of their lives. [...] But we will use as much firmness, a firmness that is perceived as a threshold of zero tolerance against those who think they can control of our streets to live illegally. It 'true that' illegality has no color of skin or special signs of identity linked to this or that crime. But it is also true that 70 percent of those who are in prison are illegal immigrants, compared with just under 10% of third country nationals who live in our Veneto. They produce, when well integrated, the 5% of the GDP of the region and it is these new citizens, who have a skin color or a different religion, they ask for the maximum penalty against illegal immigration and crime. We want to restore by force the culture of citizenship. That, as stated in the Constitution does not have colors and religions. But that is shared value that is based on shared values \u200b\u200band accepted. Those who do not respect them may not have the same access privileges of citizenship Italian and Venetian .
The truth is that many parties, today, they see the green mice.
0 comments:
Post a Comment