 |
| It is from here |
Comment yet another fool of that chameleon-like left-wing group that continues to define "majority" , is like shooting on the Red Cross. Yet one can not remain silent yet another debacle of Giancarlo Piva & C. which led to "Il Mattino di Padova " has a title like this: "A Este like little brothers of Italy . It is worth emphasizing
Furthermore, the substantial difference between the idea that journalism is aroused by a title like " Este, the proposal of PD: Inno di Mameli before each session of the Council " (24.01.11) by the realities of the proposal, which emerges from 'daily edition of the newspaper: " Concretely, the idea was to roll shall be in the background of the directors having the Inno di Mameli ", in other words, if it was, can translate into a disheartening " transform the national anthem in a sort of television themes on which to pass the credits, "because what else would you do?
But much also reveals the attitude taken to the proposal of this motion: defined as " presented by stealth", " without consulting the entire majority ", "unbeknownst to the city council " (but not the press, and I say this). Really compliments, congratulations to those who want to live to play the song in the background and offer to use what is and should be a symbol of sharing, so little shared ...
is struggling a lot about the celebrations for the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy and I groped a reflection, partly from local issues to focus on other aspects.
The academic world, or culture and vocation for those who are called to be the mentors of our contemporary society, guardians of knowledge that should be driving at this time of crisis, not only economic but also social values, much debate. Is an interesting article in "Il Corriere del Veneto " entitled "Unity of Italy, Veneto lukewarm? Divided on the roots, wounded by this "(08/01/2011), which contains the responses from historians as Lanaro, Gullino and others: of these, I would quash without the intervention of Professor uncertainties. Lanaro for whom "the flop committee [for the celebrations] birth of various causes but have one common denominator: the League. You can not preach for twenty years against the unification of Italy and then not reap the benefits "because in my view, the League is not the cause but the consequence of a situation that has been increasingly deepened.
In this sense, I read with great attention to a speech by Giuliano Amato always in "Il Corriere del Veneto " entitled, "Critical right to centralism, but the Venetians respect the history " (01/25/2011). The "Dr Subtle" says that on the anniversary of the unit of Italy " is right to point out that a choice was made very centralized in order to govern the country, which was inevitable but that certainly has resulted in prices . Faced with this centralization, " some controversy also sense" because " the historical and political events of recent years have grown in the Veneto region as in other European regions, feelings in which the exploitation of their local identity, which I think is more than fair and is a founding, controversially took place with Italy, with Rome, with the central government, with the central government . For Amato the history of Italy also means to remember than it has managed to do , such as economic unification between north and south of the country.
Italy is a very young country when compared with other Western democracies such as France and England, who have centuries of history behind them, "upset" (if you want to call it that) such as those we are experiencing, I believe are therefore quite understandable when viewed historically and analyzed from this point of view. Certainly the "youth" is not in itself a necessary and sufficient, given that other factors also play both inside and outside: in this sense we should seriously re-open the chapter historical studies of national unity to better understand the genesis of certain events and how they are inserted into the fabric of the people. Among the concepts to keep in mind, I emphasize to " nation", on which often glosses but instead plays a role of absolute centrality: expressions passed down in history as " We have made Italy we must now do the Italian "were not outlandish and far-fetched, but were genuine reason for being. Rest
also convinced that this sesquicentennial anniversary should also be an opportunity not only to look to the past but to glance over Italy to come. The federalist reform of the state is an absolute necessity, the challenge that must be not only won but won in a timely manner. Obstructions in the classroom that the parliamentary right in these last hours were raised to the approval of the reform, seem to benefit from an overall political climate for political purposes only, instead of at the expense of wider interest and indeed the national final.
The risk is not only to see a sunken reform and the whole process that is behind us, but on balance to be a federalism "little federalist", the result of a necessary and inevitable, unfortunately, "Roman mediation" with forces development of policies contrary to statute in the sense of a real and effective recognition of identity and local bodies. Ultimately, the opposing forces are those that could be attributed also failure to implement rapid, full and complete fully the existing Constitution (remember even this) and are likely unable to build a solid and concrete horizon of values that goes beyond the mere electoral cartel, to manipulate the symbols of the Fatherland.
Yes, because the risk of these celebrations is also discussed as this: to misuse the symbols in which it asks the country to identify himself.
0 comments:
Post a Comment